[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#660705: [proposal] remove the requirement to compress documentation



Hi guys,
I made a small experiment to test whether using xz to compress docs is
a viable idea. Here is my repo with the results from my Debian
machine:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/tomasz/changelog.git

I have around 5000 packages, but the stats should be "percentage-wise
representative". The uncompressed docs take ~ 1.5GB of space, gz'ed ~
400MB (26.6%) and xz'ed ~ 330MB (21.7%, see ipython notebook). You can
use main.py to get similar stats on your own Debian.

I'm thinking that having completely uncompressed docs is wasting way
too much space. On the other side of the spectrum, I wouldn't go for
xz, since gz is probably better supported by software (as Bill
mentioned) and the gain is only 70MB for a rather large installation.

What do you think?

Tomasz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: