On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 19:29 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Sorry if I sounded a bit harsh, I have been trying to explain that to the > lintian maintainers three time in a row without any success, so I started > to feel like a broken clock. No worries. > If you do not mind, please try to include some kind of motivation for your > patches next time instead of a summary of what it does. > It is rather obvious that your patch "Fix one call to gzip that was missing -n" > but why you want to do that is to me to guess (and sometime I will guess wrong > and draw bad inference). I was reviewing changes since the last time I pulled git and noticed your gzip -n changes but wondered why you applied gzip -n to some files but not others, so I incorrectly assumed it was an oversight, oops. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part