On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:44:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:41:16AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > I think this has come up before, and my recollection of where we ended up
> > > in the past is that there probably isn't any *legal* reason to require
> > > debian/copyright in source packages. However, there's a substantial
> > > *practical* reason, namely that the existing ftpmaster tooling depends on
> > > the existence of a source debian/copyright file for the way that they do
> > > license reviews, and that some tooling and process changes would be
> > > required before we can relax this requirement.
> Le Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:37:20PM +0200, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > Yes, I think this practical reason (the ability to extract
> > automatically copyright files from source packages) is the main reason
> > why debian/copyright is required.
> > So we could just add it to policy as a rationale.
> Dear Santiago and everybody,
> how about the following ? (in section 4.5)
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -1822,12 +1822,16 @@ zope.
> <sect id="dpkgcopyright">
> <heading>Copyright: <file>debian/copyright</file></heading>
> <p>
> Every {+source+} package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy
> of its copyright information and distribution license in the
> file [-<file>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var>/copyright</file>-]{+<file>debian/copyright</file><footnote>+}
> {+ The <file>debian/copyright</file> file must be present, to+}
> {+ ease the review of new packages and to facilitate automatic+}
> {+ extraction of this information. It may be generated from+}
> {+ templates, but not at build time.</footnote>+}
> (see <ref id="copyrightfile"> for further details). Also see
> <ref id="pkgcopyright"> for further considerations related to
> copyrights for packages.
> </p>
> </sect>
> <sect>
>
> Even after that change, the sentence "Every package must be accompanied by
> a verbatim copy of its copyright information and distribution license in
> the file /usr/share/doc/package/copyright" still appears twice in the
> Policy.
I disagree with clarifying Debian Policy in this direction. The practical
problem with the ftp team's tooling is a problem of their own making, and
not one that should cause more work for all Debian Developers to spend extra
time complying with a requirement which was never the intent of policy.
I will write more on this subject soon.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature