Re: Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus
On Monday 20 July 2015 17:14:03 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Bill used his position as a policy editor to reject a change, not
> because it was against consensus or against the policy process, but
> because it was against his own opinion. Not as policy editor, but as
> menu maintainer.
>
> This is the root of the problem. By asking whether the policy process
> has been respected, you are reversing the responsibility. It was Bill’s
> responsibility from day one to recuse himself from policy decisions on
> the menu.
> It was also Bill’s responsibility, from day one, to raise his own
> concerns to the policy change being discussed, not to rely on other
> people’s nitpicks *after* the new policy had been approved and
> committed.
>
> Maybe, after all, this issue should not have been sent to the TC but to
> the DPL, to ask for the revocation of the abused delegation.
Seconded.
The debian menu is de facto dead; it is time to put it out of its misery.
/Sune
--
I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a
kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world.
And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist.
- zefrank
Reply to: