Bug#769818: lintian: false positive for dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org, lintian-maint@debian.org, 769818@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Martin Erik Werner <ienorand@gmail.com>
- Subject: Bug#769818: lintian: false positive for dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph
- From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:57:12 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150708045712.GA16576@aqwa.igloo>
- In-reply-to: <20150620110009.GD19112@falafel.plessy.net>
- References: <CAE2SPAa9hMy47u83NxnsBs1sRif8bsfMmXu6Yu1D=b=sdKWcew@mail.gmail.com> <1428103547.14121.5.camel__13365.3005156249$1428103654$gmane$org@gmail.com> <551F6CD6.6040404@debian.org> <20150418062518.GJ8414@falafel.plessy.net> <55326636.2040504@debian.org> <1434722146.12789.7.camel@gmail.com> <20150620110009.GD19112@falafel.plessy.net>
Control: reassign -1 lintian
Control: retitle -1 lintian: false positive for dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph
Hello everybody,
following Martin's clear report of false positive for the tag
dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph (see below), I am reassigning
this bug to lintian.
Have a nice day,
-- Charles
Le Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:00:09PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 03:55:46PM +0200, Martin Erik Werner a écrit :
> >
> > In newer versions of lintian, this warning has changed, so the
> > following file:
> > ###
> > Format:
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
> > Upstream-Name: td
> > Source: http://example.com
> > License: dog
> > This is dog license
> >
> > Files: *
> > Copyright: someone
> > License: other
> > This is other license
> > ###
> >
> > Now reports
> > W: cn source: dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph dog
> > (paragraph at line 7)
> >
> > Which is as far as I see still the same false positive.
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I confirm that this tag is a false positive on several of my packages (for
> instance libbio-graphics-perl).
>
> Should this bug be re-assigned to lintian ?
>
> Have a nice week-end,
>
> Charles
Reply to: