On 31/01/15 at 20:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Was there a lot of failure ? > > > > No > > > > > What severity did you use for the bug report ? > > > > serious > > So in practice, this is already handled as a RC bug. Good. > > > > Are you in favor of the patch above ? > > > > In general, yes. > > So are you willing to second it ? yeah, I second this version: > + For packages in the main archive, no required targets > + may attempt network access. even if I would prefer something that did not restrict to main, and said something like: No packages may rely on network access to be available during the execution of required targets. Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature