[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753608: Clarify use of conflicts, clarify what constitutes abuse of the relation



Package: debian-policy
Severity: important
thanks

Hey Policy,

I'd like to clarify the purpose of the Conflicts relation, as written in
section 7.2 and 7.4.

Recently a package (systemd-must-die) was uploaded to NEW. This package
creates a Conflicts relation with systemd packages, and tries to prevent
their install[1].

I see this as an abuse of the Conflicts relation, and *not* a valid
reason to use it. In my opinion, this is a needless relation, and not why
Conflicts exists.


I'd really like a clarification on the point to see if my reading is
correct, and secondly, I'd really like to see policy adjusted to
explicitly forbid or allow this use in the examples (cosmetics, really).


Thanks for your work,
  Paul


[1]: really it'll just cause apt to remove the systemd-blocking-package.

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>  |   Proud Debian Developer
: :'  : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'`  http://people.debian.org/~paultag
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: