[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: missing technical policy for systemd

On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 05:53:14AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 01, Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> wrote:
> > Is there alternative documents describing the interfaces for packages to
> > interoperate with systemd, and transition documents available for packagers and
> > users that need to adapt to the new system ?
> Partially.
> I have been working on https://etherpad.fr/p/systemd-best-practices but 
> it is unfinished and not everything on this page is an opinion of the 
> systemd maintainers.

Is there any other documents ?

While this is a good start for documenting how to package unit files, this is
clearly insufficient for documenting a transition of this importance.

We absolutely need reference documents to avoid misunderstanding about the
process. The freeze has begun and basic questions about how jessie will work
do not have a canonical answer.

Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

Reply to: