Bug#768292: debian-policy: please allow copyright file to refer to license text in separate files
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> The other objection, though, was that, as a project, we don't really
> *like* the MPL 2.0 license. It's a rather irritating license that we'd
> rather people not use, and having it in common-licenses can be seen as a
> sort of endorsement. I'm not sure how much weight to put on that
> argument.
It appears that I confused this license with the Netscape Public License.
Please ignore this paragraph; I don't know of anything wrong with the MPL
2.0 other than it being complicated and long, which is just a matter of
taste. :)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: