[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[developers-reference] 02/05: Mention getting removed from e-mail aliases in retiring procedure. Closes: #736232



This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

lucas pushed a commit to branch master
in repository developers-reference.

commit bb9e357ebe47e335ce5b8cb513f97bc23385e5de
Author: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
Date:   Sun Aug 24 14:41:01 2014 -0700

    Mention getting removed from e-mail aliases in retiring procedure. Closes: #736232
---
 debian/changelog     | 2 ++
 developer-duties.dbk | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b59cd24..446dbe8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ developers-reference (3.4.14) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
   * Mention other types of checksums besides MD5. Closes: #750994
   * Mention rationale for including the description in ITPs. Closes:
     #494332
+  * Mention getting removed from e-mail aliases in retiring procedure.
+    Closes: #736232
 
  -- Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>  Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:43:04 -0700
 
diff --git a/developer-duties.dbk b/developer-duties.dbk
index 0ca0ee5..27a7ff7 100644
--- a/developer-duties.dbk
+++ b/developer-duties.dbk
@@ -270,6 +270,15 @@ in Debian RT by sending a mail to &email-keyring; with the words 'Debian
 RT' somewhere in the subject line (case doesn't matter).
 </para>
 </listitem>
+<listitem>
+<para>
+If you received mails via a @debian.org e-mail alias (e.g.
+press@debian.org) and would like to get removed, open a RT ticket for
+the Debian System Administrators. Just send an e-mail to
+&email-rt-dsa; with "Debian RT" somewhere in the subject stating
+from which aliases you'd like to get removed.
+</para>
+</listitem>
 </orderedlist>
 <para>
 It is important that the above process is followed, because finding inactive

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/developers-reference.git


Reply to: