Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64

To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: 613143@bugs.debian.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:12:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] m238gkkm9l.fsf@rahvafeir.err.no>
Reply-to: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>, 613143@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140508171958.GZ9218@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Thu, 8 May 2014 10:19:58 -0700")
References: <20110204060813.GA16363@onerussian.com> <87oc6rk79i.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com> <20110213014427.GC21845@virgil.dodds.net> <87pqqwtkq4.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com> <[🔎] 20140508171958.GZ9218@google.com>

]] Jonathan Nieder 

> Seconded.  That makes two seconds by my count (me and ballombe).
> Remember that any DD including the one who proposed a change can
> second a proposal if they think it reflects consensus (or can solicit
> more input if they think it needs it).

I didn't realise you can second your own proposal, but I'm happy to
second my proposal in that case, so seconded too.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
  - From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
Next by Date: Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
Previous by thread: Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
Next by thread: Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread