[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

>> Suggested change:
>>
>> --- /proc/self/fd/13	2011-02-13 09:12:50.142239544 +0100
>> +++ policy.sgml	2011-02-13 09:12:01.565231567 +0100
>> @@ -5993,6 +5993,13 @@
>>                    to get access to kernel information.</footnote>
>>                  </p>
>>                </item>
>> +              <item>
>> +                <p>
>> +                  The requirement for <file>/usr/local/lib&lt;qual&gt;</file>
>> +                  to exist if <file>/lib&lt;qual&gt</file> or 
>> +                  <file>/usr/lib&lt;qual&gt</file> exists is removed.
>> +                </p>
>> +              </item>
>>              </enumlist>

> Seconded.  That makes two seconds by my count (me and ballombe).
> Remember that any DD including the one who proposed a change can
> second a proposal if they think it reflects consensus (or can solicit
> more input if they think it needs it).

I second this as well, although I think it's unnecessary at this point.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply to: