Bug#613143: there is /usr/lib64 symlink but no /usr/local/lib64
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> Suggested change:
>>
>> --- /proc/self/fd/13 2011-02-13 09:12:50.142239544 +0100
>> +++ policy.sgml 2011-02-13 09:12:01.565231567 +0100
>> @@ -5993,6 +5993,13 @@
>> to get access to kernel information.</footnote>
>> </p>
>> </item>
>> + <item>
>> + <p>
>> + The requirement for <file>/usr/local/lib<qual></file>
>> + to exist if <file>/lib<qual></file> or
>> + <file>/usr/lib<qual></file> exists is removed.
>> + </p>
>> + </item>
>> </enumlist>
> Seconded. That makes two seconds by my count (me and ballombe).
> Remember that any DD including the one who proposed a change can
> second a proposal if they think it reflects consensus (or can solicit
> more input if they think it needs it).
I second this as well, although I think it's unnecessary at this point.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: