Am 25.03.2014 18:56, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 20.03.2014 23:58, schrieb Bill Allombert: >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:39:17AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:39:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >>>> So, I propse adding to the list of exceptions in policy section 9.1.1: >>>> >>>> The FHS requirement that architecture-independent application-specific >>>> static files be located in /usr/share is relaxed to a suggestion. >>>> >>>> In particular, a subdirectory of /usr/lib may be used by a package >>>> (or a collection of packages) to hold a mixture of architecture-independent >>>> and architecture-dependent files. However, when a directory is >>>> entirely composed of architecture-independent files, it should be >>>> located in /usr/share. >>> >>> Seconded. >> >> So I have created a branch 'bug741304-bill' with this change. >> Please check the diff (in attachment). I'm not a native speaker, but + The FHS requirement that architecture-independent + application-specific static files be located in I'd probably change that to "application-specific static files must be located" to emphasize that a must directive was relaxed to should. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature