Bug#707077: obsolete conffiles: s/may/should/
Le Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:07:29PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:18 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > In policy section 10.7.3 Behavior, there is this sentence:
> >
> > Obsolete configuration files without local changes may be
> > removed by the package during upgrade.
> >
> > I would like to suggest that "may" be replaced with "should".
>
> Ping, what is the status of this?
Hi Paul and everybody,
in May I opened #707077 for tracking this issue; let's use it.
Are there objections to Paul's proposition ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: