Bug#663930: debian-policy: New virtual package for naming spec compliant icon themes
- To: Fernando Lemos <fernandotcl@gmail.com>, 663930@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#663930: debian-policy: New virtual package for naming spec compliant icon themes
- From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:55:17 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130729225517.GA25293@aqwa.igloo>
- Reply-to: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>, 663930@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CANVYNa9J9JUc3xAWjG3KfcB=qUJepHgXD7_+ak81Q=0u+JpNjw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20120314022806.21135.75324.reportbug@munchkin.localnetwork> <87ehsqojh2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <CANVYNa8z5M85LyAmto1wSj_ZYUgkJty10V6DFF87sxJykhH+KQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120329060102.GA2026@burratino> <CANVYNa9J9JUc3xAWjG3KfcB=qUJepHgXD7_+ak81Q=0u+JpNjw@mail.gmail.com>
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:45:12PM -0300, Fernando Lemos a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Based on the discussion on debian-desktop, I think there is a
> > consensus on the general idea. Do you have a proposed entry for the
> > virtual-packages-names-list.txt file ready?
>
> Cool. I thought of something like:
>
> <virtual package name> icon theme compliant to the
> freedesktop.org Icon Naming Specification
>
> As for the package name itself, I like fdo-icon-theme. Would that be
> too specific? I wonder if something more generic like
> desktop-icon-theme would be more appropriate.
Dear Fernando and everybody,
is the introduction of the "fdo-icon-theme" still planned ? If yes, would the
section "Miscellaneous" of virtual-package-names-list.txt be appropriate ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: