[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#715804: Debian policy for web apps still references /doc as accessible



user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
usertags 715804 normative discussion
thanks

Le Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:24:45AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: important
> 
> The Debian policy for web apps still references /doc as accessible
> through the web (see point 3 of chapter 11.5), though it has been removed
> for security reasons. The policy should be updated.

Hi Thomas,

basically, what you propose is the following:

diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 1508231..2651a1a 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -9668,27 +9668,6 @@ http://localhost/cgi-bin/<var>cgi-bin-name</var>
                before <var>cgi-bin-name</var>).
            </item>
 
-           <item>
-             <p>Access to HTML documents</p>
-
-             <p>
-               HTML documents for a package are stored in
-                <file>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var></file>
-               and can be referred to as
-               <example compact="compact">
-http://localhost/doc/<var>package</var>/<var>filename</var>
-               </example>
-             </p>
-
-             <p>
-                The web server should restrict access to the document
-                tree so that only clients on the same host can read
-                the documents. If the web server does not support such
-                access controls, then it should not provide access at
-                all, or ask about providing access during installation.
-             </p>
-           </item>
-
             <item>
               <p>Access to images</p>
               <p>


I note that /doc was only to be served locally.  How did that cause security
issues ?

Anyway, if the webservers that we distribute have dropped that functionality
(can you confirm that it is not just apache2 ?), then I also support adjusting
the Policy accordingly.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


Reply to: