Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:28:12 -0800 with message-id <87mwwqt0r7.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> and subject line Re: Bug#616457: debian-policy: always write version of Debian in documentation at the beginning has caused the Debian Bug report #616457, regarding debian-policy: always write version of Debian in documentation at the beginning to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 616457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debian-policy: always write version of Debian in documentation at the beginning
- From: sergey <sergey_ifeo@rambler.ru>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:09:20 +0300
- Message-id: <20110304160920.2740.29266.reportbug@fc3.ru>
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Excuse me for my bad English :-) It is like bad tradition now: many documentation do not contain information about Debian version. It is very strange for me. How can be authors 100% sure that their documentation is absolutely correct for all Debian versions, from 1.1 or older to the current? Examples - documents with no Debian version: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-basic_defs.en.html http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/index.en.html http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/ Documents where Debian version is not at the begin: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-start.ru.html http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/index.html#contents -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 616457-done@bugs.debian.org, sergey <sergey_ifeo@rambler.ru>, debian-doc@lists.Debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#616457: debian-policy: always write version of Debian in documentation at the beginning
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:28:12 -0800
- Message-id: <87mwwqt0r7.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20110405180904.GC10122@yellowpig> (Bill Allombert's message of "Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:09:04 +0200")
- References: <20110304160920.2740.29266.reportbug@fc3.ru> <87fwpypvr5.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20110405180904.GC10122@yellowpig>
Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> sergey <sergey_ifeo@rambler.ru> writes: >> I do appreciate the problem that you're trying to solve here, but I >> don't think that Policy is the place to do it. And am now closing this bug on those grounds. >> If you run across a document that's for end-users, that doesn't contain >> a note about what Debian releases it applies to, and where you think >> such a note would be useful, please do file a bug against that package. >> I think that's an entirely appropriate request. > Agreed. >> If the document is on the web and you can't figure out what the >> corresponding Debian package is, well, that's actually another bug -- >> documents maintained as a Debian package should probably say that >> somewhere to aid bug filing against the web version. But you can file >> the bug against www.debian.org, noting that you can't tell what package >> it should be filed against, and they can reassign it for you. >> I'm marking this bug as wontfix but will leave it open in case other >> folks disagree with my reasoning and would like to argue that Policy >> should do something here. > It appears that a "Debian Documentation Policy" (see > <http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy>) exists. I suggest that this > report be reassigned to this project if at all possible. CCing > debian-doc@lists.Debian.org for advice. There has been no further discussion of this, so I'm going ahead and closing this bug as rejected against Policy. If anyone on the documentation policy side has a queue to which it can be reassigned and wants to pick it up, please feel free to reopen and reassign. -- Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---