Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> For other points, for instance that stand-alone license sections can also
> accept short names accompanied by their license exception, a clarification
> would not hurt; but I do not consider this a blocking problem.
I believe this should be a blocker --- it is an instance of the
document and actual practice clearly contradicting one another. I
wouldn't mind if it is resolved by forbidding stand-alone license
sections for license exceptions, though, if that's the only way to get
something released. (Of course I would prefer the opposite
resolution.)
Reply to: