Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:09:34PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Interesting. +d60 for "Debian 6.0". :)
>> What happens when there are more than 10 updates for a single Debian
>> version? Maybe that's not worth worrying about --- such a package is
>> either horribly buggy or should be using a more sensible versioning
>> scheme (e.g., ia32-libs and clamav-data just use the date).
> Given that this is part of a version number, why aren't we just using
> +d6.0 and letting dpkg handle it?
Because the period will make various programs think that it's an NMU, so
it's not as backwards compatible.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
- From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>