Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification
Correction:
https://github.com/infinity0/debian-policy/compare/bug649530-infinity0
On 18/12/12 23:53, Ximin Luo wrote:
> [deleted incorrect url]
>
> I've split up my previous patch into more manageable chunks, and added
> extra explanations in the commit messages.
>
> I'm trying to follow the principle that the commit messages should
> already contain enough justification for the changes, but if any of them
> are unclear, please do ask me for further detail.
>
> (Further potential additions, which I've omitted for simplicity, include
> License-Exception: fields, and Location: fields to formalise the concept
> of a "pointer" to a License.)
>
> Ximin
>
> On 14/12/12 03:37, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Hi Ximin,
>>
>> Ximin Luo wrote:
>>
>>> I had been using the SVN for DEP as a baseline for patches, but now I guess the
>>> source code for this is somewhere else - could one of you please point me to it?
>>
>> Sure. It's at <git://git.debian.org/git/dbnpolicy/policy.git>.
>>
>>> Also, shall I continue on this bug report, or shall I start a thread on
>>> debian-devel@ or debian-projects@?
>>
>> This bug (which sends mail to debian-policy@) is fine.
>>
>> Do I remember correctly that this report was about introducing a
>> License-Exception stanza type?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonathan
>>
>
Reply to: