[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#696185: [copyright-format] Please clarify what to use in License field for licenses not specifically mentioned



On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> writes:
>
>> I am neither a DD nor a policy editor, so my opinion shouldn't be
>> treated as authoritative in any way :)  Still, my feeling is that if
>> there is no short name for a license defined in the copyright format
>> specification (the specific version of the specification that the
>> package's copyright file references, e.g. 1.0 for the present), then the
>> packager is free to pick any short name desired.  IMHO if there is
>> indeed an SPDX identifier, it might be preferable to use that, but it is
>> not mandatory in any way.
>
> Right, this was the intent.

This makes sense. What I'm looking for is a clarification in the text
not a change to the spec. Would the attached patch be acceptable or
just overkill?

diff --git a/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
b/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
index 217e8dd..2947686 100644
--- a/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
+++ b/copyright-format/copyright-format-1.0.xml
@@ -663,6 +663,14 @@ Copyright 2009, 2010 Angela Watts</programlisting>
         license short names for unknown <varname>Format</varname> versions.
       </para>
       <para>
+        For licenses which are not currently included in the list of standard
+        short names, the maintainer may use any short name they find
+        appropriate. The license identifier used by the <link linkend="spdx">
+        SPDX</link> in their <ulink url="http://spdx.org/licenses";>Open Source
+        License Registry</ulink> may be used, but this is not mandatory in any
+        way.
+      </para>
+      <para>
         Use of a standard short name does not override the Debian Policy
         requirement to include the full license text in
         <filename>debian/copyright</filename>, nor any requirements in the



Thanks!

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething>
   Debian Developer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb>
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1

Attachment: 0001-copyright-format-Clarify-short-name-usage-for-licens.patch
Description: Binary data


Reply to: