[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681657: marked as done (Please consider Adding Open Font License to /usr/share/common-licenses)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:57:32 +0900
with message-id <20120819015732.GA21317@falafel.plessy.net>
and subject line Cleanup of bugs related to /usr/share/common-licenses.
has caused the Debian Bug report #681657,
regarding Please consider Adding Open Font License to /usr/share/common-licenses
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681657
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 6.9
Severity: wishlist

Open Fonts License (OFL)[1] is most widely used license in fonts. This
is license is also considered as DFSG Free license [2].

Since many font packages use this license it would be easier for the
maintainer to just provide a link to the existing OFL file on a Debian
system than trying to include whole OFL text inside the
debian/copyright folder.

Please consider adding this license and make life of a font package
maintainer easy :-).

[1] http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#The_Open_Font_License

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii  gawk [awk]  1:4.0.1+dfsg-2
ii  mawk [awk]  1.3.3-17

base-files recommends no packages.

base-files suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

In line with our procedures (http://wiki.debian.org/PolicyChangesProcess),
I am closing this bug, as it is already marked as rejected (wontfix).

Have a nice Sunday,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

--- End Message ---

Reply to: