[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#452393: [PROPOSAL] clarify overstep between "required" and "important" priorities



On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 15:31:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Could someone who has the time to put together a script for this check to
> see whether this is actually true?  (Namely, that the only thing in
> required are essential packages and their dependencies.)
> 
As far as I can tell the following packages are Priority: required but
not Essential: yes (in sid/amd64/main), or (pre-)depended on by an
Essential package (possibly recursively):

- debconf-i18n, liblocale-gettext-perl, libtext-charwidth-perl,
  libtext-iconv-perl, libtext-wrapi18n-perl: since debconf 1.5.39 -i18n
  is only a Recommends.  Could probably be downgraded to important?
- mawk: one of the alternatives for base-files' Pre-Depends, so actually
  pseudo-essential
- xz-utils: Jonathan covered this

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: