[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: License statement of the debconf specification



Russ Allbery wrote:
> I assume that the terms of the license that's attempting to state is the
> three-clause BSD license:
> 
>     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>     modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
>     met:
> 
>      1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>         notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>      2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>         notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>         documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>      3. Neither the name of the Debian Project nor the names of its
>         contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
>         this software without specific prior written permission.

Clause 3 is the advertising clause, isn't it? The license statement explicitly
says without that clause. So, the license in debconf's own copyright
file would seem most appropriate.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: