Re: Bug#628515: recommending verbose build logs
user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
usertags 628515 normative discussion
thanks
Le Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 04:39:33AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, 2011-11-26, 18:37:
>
> [...]
> >> I do not suspect there is a
> >> consensus for this.
> >
> > Why do you think there is not?
>
> I was guessing, it seems incorrectly, based on the lack of seconds
> or other discussion on this policy proposal.
Dear all,
as a maintainer who turned on verbosity on his build logs, I would be fine with
either implementation, together with the message that we (as a project) would
like verbose logs on the buildds unless they cause problems for instance with
their size, that is, a “should” recommendation.
I think that the best way to see which of verbose or noverbose is to be chosen
would be to go through the soft release goal or release recommendation that
Matthias advocated. Once the mayonnaise thickens (once the recommendation is
followed), then it will have its place in the Policy.
That of course does not prevent volunteers to work on the wording in advance if
they feel so. But the critical step is to induce other developers to follow
the idea.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: