Bug#625449: Permanent BSP patch
Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:22:46PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>
> Yes. If a maintainer is taking more that for a *RC* bug fix, then they
> *should* keep the buglog updated with status.
Talking about the GCC 4.6 “*RC bugs*”, I got one other report telling that
Debian's GCC 4.6.1 will introduce more failures. Then why do we need to act in
emergency and fix all the 4.6.0 bugs within 7 days ? Can't you tolerate us to
collate both transitions, without having to put placeholders bugs in the BTS ?
I still do not understand why pressure is given to answer in 7 days, which is
at most one full week-end, for non-urgent issues. We lose energy, trying to be
too much ahead of upstream's work. I read a lot of complains on -devel that
the manpower is short for the release, but please consider that it is short
elsewhere as well. Please chose carefully your words in a way that does not
call for wasting it.
Cheers,
--
Charles
Reply to: