Re: Please apply the following patches for copyright-format.xml.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:01:17AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> user email@example.com
> usertags 649674 informative
> tag 649674 patch
> usertags 649679 normative issue
> Le Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> > As I said previously, my plan was to upload 3.9.3 as soon as the DEP issues are resolved.
> > Unfortunately the DEP-related issues are becoming confusing.
> Thanks for the clarification.
> I am sorry for the mess around the DEP. I know I share the responsability for
> it. But let's take an optimistic point of view: there are no major blocker
> reported, and the recent resolution of #633797 shows that we can cooperate and
> converge on a consensus when tackling new issues.
> So I would like to propose to apply the following patches, and after this to
> call for either reporting new issues or declaring the DEP accepted.
> Correction of the examples
> This is a patch that bring the examples in compliance with the DEP, by
> correcting one typo and adding two missing license short names.
> Making the examples more informative would be a plus, but unless
> Steve directly supports this I would propose to not touch them further.
> Specification of “with <keywords> exception”.
> This is a normative change that has a very broad consensus, that limits the
> use of license exceptions to one keyword, and only for granting additional
> permissions. I have updated the patch to fully reflect Steve's changes
> (including the commit message).
> URL is http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
> Consensus is reached and David from the WWW team started to work on installing
> the documents on www.debian.org at this URL.
> Correction of Python license name and SPDX URLs.
> The SPDX website is back ! URL corrections are not normative, and correction
> of Python license name was agreed earlier.
I have applied all these patches.
Imagine a large red swirl here.