On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:03:27 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I have no objection to this for 1.0, provided we at the same time clarify > > that if more than one exception is in use, you need to use a custom > > shortname instead of an ORed or ANDed list of licenses. > > > > Is there a consensus for this position? > > Le Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:49:46AM +0700, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Above approach sounds reasonable to me. Seconded. > > Le Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:38:29AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > Seconded. Same here. > <para> > - Exceptions and clarifications are signaled in plain text, by appending > - <literal>with <varname><replaceable>keywords</replaceable></varname> > + Exceptions or clarifications are signaled in plain text, by appending > + <literal>with <varname><replaceable>keyword</replaceable></varname> > exception</literal> to the short name. This document provides a list of > - keywords that refer to the most frequent exceptions. > + keywords that refer to the most frequent exceptions. In case a license > + is modified by multiple exceptions or clarifications, a single arbitrary > + short name must be used. > </para> Seconded. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bruce Springsteen: I'm On Fire
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature