Bug#542288: Version numbering: native packages, NMU's, and binary only uploads
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> I believe it should also document the N.N standard for
>> NMUs of non-native packages, since people don't seem inclined to change to
>> +nmu and there's probably no reason to do so.
I suppose this isn't a compelling argument, but it's just rather
strange that two different schemes/standards are in play here. As a
temporary transition, the wording could say non-native nmus can be
versioned with either +nmun or n.n with +nmun favored as that will
become the standard in the future.
Best wishes,
Mike
Reply to: