[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#640737: [copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 27/09/2011 21:17, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:
>> Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :

>>> The advantage of instead using:
>>>
>>>     http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>>>
>>> is that, when one is using a simple mapping from URLs to file space, if
>>> for some reason the document ever needs to be broken into multiple
>>> files or needs to have images, the URL already assumes each document is
>>> in its own directory and keeps all those supporting files isolated from
>>> each other for multiple versions.

Good point.

>> I proposed copyright-format-1.0 because it seemed to fit better David's
>> requirements, as for the URI you propose the file name of the spec would
>> be ‘index.html’.  For both URIs it looks equally easy to install the
>> files.  I will follow the WWW team's choice for sure.
> 
> My assumption was that we would (for right now in the absence of needing
> any supporting files) generate a single HTML file named
> copyright-format-1.0.html, which the web team would then copy as
> index.html into a directory named after the version number.

Thanks Russ, such a name (copyright-format-<version>.html) would totally
fit the (maybe badly expressed, sorry if I confused you, Charles)
requirements I could think of, to publish the current version of the
copyright-format policy, keeping the www build simple.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=D6bO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: