Bug#218893: Proposal: Build-Features [Fix for the build-arch problem]
Roger Leigh <email@example.com> writes:
> However, it was my understanding from the discussion that the proposals
> being discussed here are basically about how best to realise the goal of
> having build-arch and build-indep implemented; I thought that the goal
> itself was relatively uncontroversial, but the means of achieving it
> were still under discussion.
Bill has said that he doesn't agree with the long-term goal of making the
targets mandatory. So far as I know, he's the only one who's said that in
the discussion, but he's right that the tech-ctte hasn't made a decision
on that yet, and it's probably fair to say that his stated disagreement
does make it controversial.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>