Hi Bill On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:25:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:31:51AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Dominic > > > > Only read trough yet (but not native english speaker): > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> > > > --- > > > perl-policy.sgml | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/perl-policy.sgml b/perl-policy.sgml > > > index b9f3277..47cf9f6 100644 > > > --- a/perl-policy.sgml > > > +++ b/perl-policy.sgml > > > @@ -461,6 +461,26 @@ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts > > > package must depend upon it explicitly. > > > </p> > > > </sect> > > > + > > > + <sect id="perl_upgrades"> > > > + <heading>Perl Package Upgrades</heading> > > > + <p> > > > + Starting from <package>perl</package> 5.12.3-2, a dpkg trigger > > > + named <var>perl-major-upgrade</var> will be triggered by the > > > + postinst of the <package>perl</package> package during major > > > + upgrades. Some examples of things which consitute a major upgrade > > > > consitute -> constitute > > Hello Salvatore, > > Are you willing to second it ? Yes, if Niko as maintainer of perl package with Dominic agrees on it too, I would like to second the proposal with the latest patch provided by Dominic (with the spelling fixes). But I would prefer to hear opinion from Niko to be sure. Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature