[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#620870: debian-policy: Please add /run as FHS exception


> +                  replacement for <file>/var/run</file>, and its
> +                  subdirectory <file>/run/lock</file> is a replacement for
> +                  <file>/var/lock</file>.  These changes have been
> +                  adopted by most distributions and have been proposed
> +                  for inclusion in a future revision of the FHS.  Both
> +                  are expected to be temporary filesystems, whose

Reading this text, my understanding is that /run/lock should be a separate
temporary filesystem (on top of /run). I would prefer if we not explicitly added
that to policy and only say that /run is expected to be a temporary file system.

Other than that, the proposed text looks fine too me and has my seconds.

Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: