Re: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74

To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:18:12 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110301231812.GB27537@yellowpig>
Mail-followup-to: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110301081841.GA27436@elie>
References: <20110116085449.GA28726@merveille.plessy.net> <[🔎] 20110301081841.GA27436@elie>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:18:41AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:48:24 +0900
> 
> ---
> Hi Charles,
> 
> Charles Plessy wrote:
> 
> > I attached here a patch that corrects a syntax error introduced by one of my
> > previous patches, applied last September (45cbe74). The policy in the current
> > master branch (9b45eca) currently does not build for that reason.
> 
> Thanks for the fixup.  Bill or Russ, could you apply this?

Done as 11ced50c61b4b242baa34428de74d93d64e846cd.

Cheers,
Bill.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
  - From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

References:
- [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
  - From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Policy 12.3: Existence of files in /u/s/doc/ during build?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
Previous by thread: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH resend] Correct unclosed start-tag introduced in 45cbe74
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread