On Monday 31 January 2011 09:38:42 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, January 30, 2011 20:46, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> writes:
> >> The tech-ctte did decide on that matter. What's the progress on this
> >> bug now? Is there any action taken as a consequence of it?
> >
> > It's waiting for someone to do the work required to come up with a
> > transition plan. No one so far has had time and interest to work on it.
> > The details of what needs to be done at a high level are covered in the
> > open Policy bug.
>
> Tim Brown <timb@nth-dimension.org.uk> ("[machine]" on IRC) showed recent
> interest to work on this for wheezy, and I pointed him to the relevant
> policy bug.
I am indeed interested in getting this bug and related bugs solved for wheezy.
I'm going to start off by generating a list of packages that are currently
affected and then the hard work begins.
Tim
--
Tim Brown
<mailto:timb@nth-dimension.org.uk>
<http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.