Bug#488214: make mailx a registered virtual package name
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Piotr Kaczuba <pepe@attika.ath.cx> writes:
>> Before 1.2.65 logcheck depended on mailx, which was and still is
>> provided by both mailutils and bsd-mailx. Now that logcheck depends
>> explicitly on bsd-mailx, you can't have installed both logcheck and
>> mailutils because mailutils and bsd-mailx exclude each other.
> mailx is not a registered virtual package name in Policy. It sounds like
> it should be? If unrelated packages should know about it for
> dependencies, I don't think it meets the "private use among coordinated
> packages" exception.
I propose the following addition. Seconds or objections? (As mentioned
elsewhere in the file, the * indicates that the providing packages are
using alternatives, which appears to be the case.)
diff --git a/virtual-package-names-list.txt b/virtual-package-names-list.txt
index 9ba66e5..7944d8d 100644
--- a/virtual-package-names-list.txt
+++ b/virtual-package-names-list.txt
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ News and Mail
imap-server an IMAP mail server
mail-reader a mail user agent (e.g. Pine, Elm, mailx, &c)
mail-transport-agent a mail transport agent (e.g. Smail, Sendmail, &c)
+ mailx a /usr/bin/mailx binary (*)
news-reader a news reader (e.g. trn, tin, &c)
news-transport-system a local news system (e.g. INN, C News or B News)
pgp a version of PGP (International or US)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: