Bug#592610: 7.3/7.4/7.6: Usage of Breaks and Conflicts unclear and contradictive

["Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <ext-lyubimkin.eugene@nokia.com>]

Seconded.

Specifically, Policy now allows use Breaks, not Conflicts if two 
packages has a file conflict. I consider it as a regression - a 
high-level package manager cannot assume anymore that two packages 
having Breaks can be installed (temporarily) without a file conflict, 
and IMO the whole purpose of Breaks (as opposed to Conflicts) is defeated.

Please not write policy to reflect currently existing problems in some 
high-level package managers which do wrong thing seeing 
'Conflicts+Replaces'.