[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#208010: Require init.d scripts comply with LSB



btw: Perhaps someone can explain me, when the Policy requests:
>These scripts should not fail obscurely when the configuration files
>remain but the package has been removed, as configuration files remain
>on the system after the package has been removed.

I mean are there any special technical reasons?

At least from a conceptual point of view it should be just the opposite
IMO.
I see no harm if such a script would fail, except nasty error messages.
And then a user can still decide to purge the package,.. and perhaps
save his personal customisations to the scripts (if any).

With dependency based boot it could even harm, that such scripts are
there but don't fail. Imagine that another script requires or suggests
it (either for start or stop) but the package is removed and the init
scripts still gives an "everything ok exit 0".


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Reply to: