Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking
Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
> Where does policy define the concept of 'non-default alternative' for
> dependencies ?
Good point. I think this should be more explicit, not just for this but
because it's a common topic elsewhere (such as with the default MTA) and
is something packagers should keep in mind when writing alternative
dependencies. I've just filed a new bug against Policy for this
discussion, since it's somewhat independent.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: