Bug#556015: Clarify requirements for copyright file
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> This encourages arch:any -> arch:all symlinks, which is exactly what
> I wanted to be disallowed.
If we're going to allow any symlinks, these are the ones that are most
advantagous to allow, because otherwise we're duplicating
documentation and copyrights in all of our architectures instead of
just having them present once.
I think there's some confusion here; debian/control documents changes
to the source package, and as such, should always have the source
version listed. [Binnmus have a changelog revision, but this is
technically a violation, as their source version is not Y+bNN, but Y.]
Don Armstrong
--
Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be
running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to
repetitive music.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: