On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:04:12PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > On Friday 23 April 2010 11:35:16 Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:27:32AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: > > No, it definitely isn't ok. Versioned conflicts still impose significant > > constraints on calculating an upgrade path between releases and contribute > > to upgrade failures. > I disagree. Using versioned Conflicts+Replaces for upgrades don't impose any > additional constraints to calculating upgrade path. I explicitly was not talking about the case where Conflicts are used together with Replaces. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature