Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified

To: Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, 578854@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:03:18 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 201004231103.20676.jackyf.devel@gmail.com>
Reply-to: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com>, 578854@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100423072732.5333.15721.reportbug@rivendell.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 20100423072732.5333.15721.reportbug@rivendell.localdomain>

On Friday 23 April 2010 10:27:32 Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> 1/ fix that statement IMO

Seconded.

> 2/ document clearly whether versioned Breaks+Replaces or versioned
>    Conflicts+Replaces ought to be used when moving files around.
Seconded, with preference to have Conflicts+Replaces for this aim.

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
  - From: Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
Next by Date: Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
Previous by thread: Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
Next by thread: Bug#578854: debian-policy: Wording about Conflicts needs to be clarified
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread