On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:33:29PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Packages must include a copyright or lack-of-copyright statement > in debian/copyright. Claims that the policy never meant > copyright notices were supposed to be included in the first place > only muddle the discussion. > This says “copyright information” instead of “copyright notices” > because as long as the information is there, it doesn’t matter if > it has exactly the same formatting. For example, combining the > dates from multiple copyright notices is a common practice. > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> > --- > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I agree that "copyright information" vs. "copyright notices" is reasonable, > > and there's no clear precedent in policy or the archive for preferring the > > former interpretation over the latter. So I'd be happy to second your > > proposed text over my own. > Thanks. Okay, here goes. Seconded. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature