also sprach Frank Lin PIAT <fpiat@klabs.be> [2009.10.26.1726 +0100]: > > fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory is FHS conformant. > > I don't agree, but... Why not? That is precisely what /srv is for. > > tftpd and tftpd-hpa default for this in unstable now, leaving aftpd > > being the only one missing. would be nice if aftpd would just adapt. > > creating a policy entry about it when there are three packages in total > > implementing it, looks a bit overengineered for me (gain vs. > > administrative overhead). but that's probably just me :) > > There might be an easy way to handle the situation. The policy could be > worded as: > > * The /var/lib/tftpboot is the logical location for tftpd server root > directory. It can be a directory or symlink to a directory elsewhere. I don't consider /var/lib logical *at all*. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)