Bug#392479: Request for virtual package ircd
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@golden-gryphon.com> writes:
> So, there were few arguments made in favour of the virtual
> package, and there seems to have been a fairly strong consensus that
> the virtual package was not needed, and would provide no benefit.
> Given that, I would like to close this report, without providing
> the virtual package, unless some Rationale is provided.
I concur.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: