Bug#206684: mandatory use of debconf for user prompting a release goal for squeeze
Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
> Is there actually packages that does not use debconf ?
I'm not sure how many of these were false positives, but I'm fairly sure
that at least some of them are real:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/read-in-maintainer-script.html
> Should we draft an exception for the few situation where debconf is
> unavailable ? (e.g. dpkg and glibc before debconf is installed)
Yes. I think there was some sort of essential package exception discussed
earlier in the bug (although even essential packages should try debconf
first and fall back if it's not available, I think).
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: