[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#555981: debian-policy: No clear discussion of arch-independent vs. arch-dependent packages



Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> (12/11/2009):
> Architecture-independent packages are packages that will function on
> any architecture supported by Debian.

While I can think of plenty of Perl packages where it's about
“functioning”, there are also a lot of data packages around, so I'm
not sure “function” is the best term here.

> They generally should not contain any compiled binaries, since these
> would be specific to a particular architecture.

There could be architecture-specific headers, paths, config files
maybe, etc. Maybe prepend that with “In particular,”?

> Programs that must be compiled for each architecture must be
> distributed in separate architecture-dependent packages for each
> architecture, not as one architecture-independent package containing
> all the binaries.

Heh, never thought of that. :))

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: