Re: Bug#545691: diverting telinit
On Fri, Oct 23 2009, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> if [ -x /sbin/init ] && [ -d /proc/1 ] &&
>> [ "$(stat -c %d/%i /sbin/init)" = "$(stat -Lc %d/%i /proc/1/exe 2>/dev/null)" ] ; then
>> # So, init exists, and there is a linuxy /proc, and the inode of
>> # the executable of the process with uid 1 is the same as
>> # /sbin/init (ok, no init=/bin/sh going on)
>>
>> if [ "$(stat -c %d/%i /)" = "$(stat -Lc %d/%i /proc/1/root 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
>> # the devicenumber/inode pair of / is the same as that of
>> # /sbin/init's root, so we're *not* in a chroot
>>
>> # Final sanity check. Make sure there is a /dev/initctl
>> # for us to talk to
>> if [ -e /dev/initctl ]; then
>
> Last I checked, the kfreebsd-* architectures don't use /dev/initctl; I
> think it's something like /etc/.initctl. They do, however, have a
> linuxy proc. You should probably check with the porters as to what
> location is appropriate on those architectures.
Well, this was not an issue i my case, since these packages do
not support ! linux, but yes, a generic solution would have to cater
to that as well.
manoj
--
Today is the first day of the rest of the mess.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: