On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:28:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Support for architecture wildcards has been added to dpkg-1.13.13. This > patch, based on a proposal from Andres Mejia, provides policy on how > architecture wildcards should be used for other tools such as sbuild and > pbuilder. This patch has tracked and incorporated suggestions embedded > the discussion of the proposal. It also brings policy up to speed and in > line with dpkg-dev which appears to generate an Architecture line that > includes both architectures and special values like "all". [snip] > + lists.<footnote> As mentioned in the footnote for > + specifying a list of architectures, this is a settings for A minor point, but should this not be "a setting"? > + a minority of cases where the program is not > + portable. Generally, it should not be used for new > + packages. Also note that the wildcards are not expanded > + then compared, they are simply matched. </footnote> If G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential?
Attachment:
pgp11NdyQr8q9.pgp
Description: PGP signature