Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu27@gmail.com> (24/08/2009): > > Basically, I feel that assuming that all packages that use a patch > > system require a README.source is damaging the concept of > > README.source - as the archive grows more boilerplate descriptions > > on how to invoke quilt et al, I fear maintainers will simply not > > bother to consult this file when examining a package. > > Full ack. I've so far ignored it (unless forced by my sponsor) since > it's just a recommendation, because I think a package that simply > uses one of the common patch systems doesn't need any explanation in > README.source. Seconded. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature